Montessori gets a lot right, but here's where I disagree.
Montessori philosophy gets a lot right. Respect for a child's independence, structured environments, letting kids build competence through repetition instead of rescue. I recommend Montessori principles in homes regularly and use them with my own family.
But there's one place where I think the philosophy gets it wrong, and it happens to be one of the tools I teach parents that has been tested for decades by clinical researchers to be effective, particularly with children with behavioral challenges. Montessori discourages praise. Traditional Montessori guidance tells parents and teachers to avoid saying "good job," to withhold evaluative language, and to let a child's own satisfaction in mastering a task be the only reward. The concern is real: praise can become disconnected from anything the child actually did, and over time kids can start performing for the praise instead of the task.
I understand the concern. I don't believe the fix is to withhold praise.
Generic praise, the "good job" and "you're so smart" variety, has a mixed track record. Praising a child's traits or intelligence rather than their effort can make kids more afraid of failure and less willing to attempt hard things, because the praise ties their worth to an outcome instead of a process. I've worked with teen patients where this constant praising of only the A's led to perfectionism or anxiety about anything less than perfect.
But there's a second category of praise that behaves completely differently, and it's the one Montessori philosophy throws out along with the first: labeled praise, or what I call strategic labeled praise. This is praise that names the specific behavior. Instead of "good job," you say "Good job putting your shoes away on your own." Instead of "you're so smart," you say "I love how much effort you put into solving that math problem."
Labeled praise isn't evaluative the way Montessori worries about. It's informational. It tells a child exactly what they did that worked, so they can do it again. Behavioral Parent Training, especially Parent-Child Interaction Therapy, has built an entire evidence base around this exact tool, and it consistently shows up as one of the most reliable ways to increase positive behaviors and improve the parent-child relationship.
In my practice, labeled praise isn't about being overly nice to your child, although the kind words do improve the relationship. It's a behavioral intervention. When a parent labels a specific behavior soon after it happens, they're giving the child's brain a clear signal: this, specifically, is what worked. Do this again.
Kids with behavioral challenges especially need this kind of clarity. A child who struggles with impulse control or anger often has no idea which of their actions are landing well with a parent, because most of the feedback they get is corrective. Labeled praise flips that ratio. "Good job" gives a child nothing to act on. Naming the behavior does.
Withholding praise entirely, in the name of protecting intrinsic motivation, removes one of the few tools that reliably shapes behavior while a child is still building the self-regulation Montessori is ultimately trying to cultivate. You can't skip straight to intrinsic motivation with a five-year-old who doesn't yet have the regulation to get there unassisted. Labeled praise is often the bridge.
The irony is that labeled praise doesn't work against what Montessori cares about most, it works for it, when strategic labeled praise is used in a specific way.
Montessori philosophy is built around self-efficacy: a child who believes they are capable. That belief doesn't come from being told "good job." It comes from evidence, and strategic labeled praise is exactly that, delivered in real time about exactly what a child can actually do.
I've watched this play out in the same practical life routines Montessori classrooms or homes are built around: pouring water without spilling, buttoning a shirt unassisted, setting a table, spreading butter on toast with a dull knife. These are the exact tasks Montessori uses to build independence, and they're also exactly where strategic labeled praise does its best work.
I don't think Montessori is wrong that empty, constant, generic praise is a problem for some children. A parent who says "good job" reflexively, for everything, dilutes the word until it means nothing.
Here's what I tell parents who feel caught between the two philosophies: you don't have to choose withholding praise or drowning your kid in it. Assess what you've tried already. If it's working, keep doing it, I never want to change something that's genuinely working. But if it's not working, I'd recommend adding in strategic labeled praise to see if you can move the needle. In a decade of clinical work with families using this strategy, I have only seen it improve independence, routines, and daily life skills.
Keep up the work on Parent Step 2 this week.
— Dr. Emily
These articles teach the framework. The program applies it to your specific family, with 1-on-1 sessions with Dr. Emily.